← The Batshit Bugle
    Report: Passive Real Estate Income Anything But Passive, Income — Batshit Bugle satirical news illustrationSatire

    Report: Passive Real Estate Income Anything But Passive, Income

    Plan of acquiring duplex for "mailbox money" finds area father with second job working nights and weekends.

    By William Zeckendorf
    •

    COLUMBUS, OH— Nine months after acquiring a duplex to “let his money work for him,” local man Greg Tanner, 41, confirmed Tuesday that his passive real estate income is neither passive nor, technically, income.

    “The YouTube guys said I’d be collecting checks from a beach,” said Tanner, speaking from a crawl space where he was attempting to restore heat to Unit B for the fourth time since October.

    “Instead I’m on a first-name basis with a plumber, an eviction attorney, and my local tax assessor who I’m pretty sure has something against me personally...”

    According to Tanner’s spreadsheet, the property generates $2,400 a month in rent, of which roughly $600 is actually paid. That figure is offset by the mortgage, an 18% property tax hike, three replaced toilets, and an insurance premium that doubled after a tenant reported that the front walkway stones had a "height differential".

    At press time, Tanner’s employer confirmed his productivity has dropped sharply, noting he recently stepped out of a quarterly review to respond to a tenant's text labeled “BREAKER BOX SMELL??”

    #real estate#passive income#work#personal finance

    More from the Bugle

    All Real Estate →

    Free · Delivered every Friday

    Subscribe to The Batshit Bugle Weekly

    Fake financial news, with a hint of sweet truth...

    The week's most batshit headlines — delivered every Friday.

    We use double opt-in because we value our subscribers: one email to confirm, nothing else until you click it. No spam. Unsubscribe whenever the joke stops landing.

    The Batshit Bugle is satire. We invent fake news quotes, sources, and story details for comedic effect. References to real public figures are intentional parody of public discourse and should not be mistaken for factual reporting. We occasionally make up names of characters for fake news stories... Any resemblance to actual people, living, dead or undead, is unintentional and coincidental.